Current trends in research on innovation in social sciences: a bibliometric study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v14.4826Keywords:
Trends, Research, Social Sciences, Bibliometrics, Innovation, Technology, SocietyAbstract
Innovation has always been felt as a concern for all societies, which is why it has been and is an integral part of humanity. This study focuses on describing the con-temporary scientific production on innovation in the social sciences and analyzing the lines of research in this field. For this, bibliometry was used as a quantitative method. Scientific production shows a growing trend, as of 2016, with an annual growth rate in the period 2010-2021 of 11.5%. Four topics of interest were iden-tified: innovation and technology; tourism; ethics and governance and social and communication.
References
Allen, T. y Cohen, S. (1969). Information Flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quaterly, 14, 12-20.
Biocat (2020). La COVID-19 impulsa la innovación y dispara la inversión en salud. https://www.biocat.cat/es/noticias/destacamos-2020-covid-19-impulsa-innovacion-dispara-inversion-salud
Castells, M. (2005). La era de la información. Economía, sociedad y cultura. La sociedad red, I. Siglo XXI, editores.
Castro, E. (2020). Ciencias humanas y sociales en la innovación. Nueva Revista, 1, 5-9.
Castro, E. y Fernández, I. (2013). El significado de innovar. Catarata.
Cehan, A., Eva, M., & Iațu, C. (2021). A multilayer network approach to tourism collaboration. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.01.006
Chen, J. K., & Chen, I. S. (2012). Creative-oriented personality, creativity improvement, and innovation level enhancement. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1625-1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9471-8
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Coello, D., Santander, K., Zambrano, W. y Cedeño, J. (2021). Innovación tecnológica y su impacto en el desarrollo de las microempresas por COVID-19. Ciencia Latina, revista multidisciplinar, 5(4), 4576-4590. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v5i4.641
Cóndor-Herrera, O. (2020). Educar en tiempo de COVID-19. CienciaAmérica, 9(2), 7-14.
Dees, J. G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of business ethics, 111(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
Domingo, C. (2013). El viaje de la innovación. La guía definitiva para innovar con éxito. Gestión 2000.
Echeverría, J. (2004). Los Señores del aire: Telépolis y el Tercer Entorno. Ediciones Destomp.
Ellegaard, O., y Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2020). Innovación: una perspectiva sociológica. Revista Española de Sociología, 29(3), 5-37. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.55
Fieseler, C., Fleck, M., & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of business ethics, 91(4), 599-614.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0135-8
Flipse, S. M., van der Sanden, M. C., & Osseweijer, P. (2013). The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 703-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9423-2
Forest, J. (2017). Creative Rationality and Innovation. Wiley.
Hall, M. y Williams, A. (2008). Tourism and Innovation. Routledge.
Hemphala, J. y Magnusson, M. (2012). Networks for innovation-But, what networks and what innovation? Networks for innovation, 21(1), 3-16.
Hossain, M. (2020). Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470
Kahn, K. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61, 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011
Leonard, D. y Sensiper, S. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review, 40, 112–32.
Lévy, P. (1999). Cibercultura. Editora 34.
Maggioni, I., Marcoz, E. M., & Mauri, C. (2014). Segmenting networking orientation in the hospitality industry: An empirical research on service bundling. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 42, 192-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.07.002
Marques, C., Almeida, I. y Gomes, C. (2012). Tecnhology innovation- electronic game un the Brazilian Higher Education. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), 32-43.
Melé, D. (2016). Innovación responsable: ¿Qué puede aportar la ética? International Society for Business and economic Ethics. Shanghai.
Menissier, T. (2011). Pholosophie et innovation, ou philosophie de l´innovation? Revue philosophique, 18, 10-27.
Moulaert, F. (2016). Social Innovation: Institutionally Embedded, territorially (re) produced. En Moulaert, F. (Ed.) Social Innovation and Territorial Development, London: Taylor and Francis.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. y Mulgan, G. (2017). The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation.
OCDE. (2006). Innovation and Growth in Tourism. OCDE.
OCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. Grupo Tragsa.
Pellé, S. (2017). Business, innovation and responsibility. 7. ISTE. In Reber, B. Responsible Research and innovation set.
Reillon, V. (2016). Understanding Innovation, EPRS-European Parliamentary Research Service, Briefing, February 2016. European Union.
Schumpeter, J. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700054279
Schroeder, D. y Ladikas, M. (2015). Towards principled responsible research and innovation: employing the difference principle in funding decisions. Journal of Responsible innovation, 2(2), 169-183.
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: Prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of business ethics, 94(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2
So, K. K. F., Oh, H., & Min, S. (2018). Motivations and constraints of Airbnb consumers: Findings from a mixed-methods approach. Tourism Management, 67, 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.009
Solow, R. (1970). Growth Theory: an Exposition. Oxford University Press.
Ulnicane, I., Eke, D. O., Knight, W., Ogoh, G., & Stahl, B. C. (2021). Good governance as a response to discontents? Déjà vu, or lessons for AI from other emerging technologies. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(1-2), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1840220
Vallaeys, F. (2020). Why corporate social responsibility is not yet transformative? A philosophical clarification. Andamios, 17(42), 309-333. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v17i42.745.
Van Raan, A. F. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: interdisciplinary research and perspectives, 3(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of business ethics, 143(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z
Von Schomberg, R. (2013). Vision of responsible research and innovation. In Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. Responsible innovation. John Wiley & Sons.
Wagner, M. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 581-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0339-y
Wang, C. J. (2016). Does leader-member exchange enhance performance in the hospitality industry? The mediating roles of task motivation and creativity. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 969-987. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2014-0513
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright over their work.
