Charles S. Peirce and the Neglected Argument for the Reality of God
Keywords:
Charles S. Peirce, God, Musement, AbductionAbstract
This paper aims, above all, to invite a direct reading of the article that Charles S. Peirce published in 1908 with the title “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” More than a century after its original publication, that article by Peirce has not lost its relevance: its careful reading continues to provide a lot to think about. To this end, my presentation is organized in six sections: 1) introduction; 2) presentation of “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”; 3) the notion of reality; 4) the heart of the “Neglected Argument”; 5) contemporary discussion: a response to Oya (2021); and 6) conclusion.
References
Anderson. D. (1990). Three Appeals in Peirce's Neglected Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 26, 349-362.
Anderson. D. (1995). Strands of System. The Philosophy of Charles Peirce. Purdue University Press.
Anderson, D. (2013) The Pragmatic Importance of Peirce's Religious Writings. En D. R Anderson y C. R. Hausman, Conversations on Peirce. Reals and Ideals, (pp. 149-165). Fordham University Press.
Atkins, R. K. (2016). Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Ayim, M. (1974). Retroduction: The Rational Instinct. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 10(1), 34-43.
Barrena, S. (1996). Charles S. Peirce: Un argumento olvidado a favor de la realidad de Dios. Introducción, traducción y notas, Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico 34. http://www.unav.es/gep/Barrena/cua34.html.
Barrena, S. (2008). El "Argumento Olvidado" de C. S. Peirce cien años después: Dios, juego y símbolo. Methodus, 3, 23-45.
Barrena, S. y Nubiola, J. (2013). Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914): Un pensador para el siglo XXI. m Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.
Boulting, N. (2021). The God of Religion and the God of Philosophy Revisited: Hartshorne, Peirce, and Weil. Process Studies, 50(1), 88-106.
Cantens, B. (2006). Peirce on Science and Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 59, 93-115.
Clanton, J, C. (2014). The Structure of C. S. Peirce's Neglected Argument for the Reality of God: A Critical Assessment. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 50(2), 175-200.
Daniel-Hughes, B. (2015). The Neglected Arguments of Peirce's Neglected Argument: Beyond a Theological Dead-End. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 36(2), 121-139.
Hardwick, C. (ed.). (1977). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Indiana University Press.
Johnson, H. C. (2006). Charles Sanders Peirce and the Book of Common Prayer. Elocution and the Feigning of Piety. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 42, 552-573.
Mayorga, R. M. (2020). Las musas y el "argumento olvidado" de Peirce. Estudios Filosóficos, 69, 283-296.
Nubiola, J. (2004). C. S. Peirce y la abducción de Dios. Tópicos, 27, 73-93. https://www.unav.es/users/PeirceAbduccionDios.html
Nubiola, J. (2018). La realidad de Dios: Entender el Argumento Olvidado. En J. F. Trujillo (Ed.), El pragmaticismo de C. S. Peirce: comunidad, realismo y verdad, (pp. 223-238). Universidad del Valle. https://www.unav.es/users/LaRealidadDeDios2018.pdf
Orange, D. M. (1984). Peirce's Conception of God: A Developmental Study. Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism.
Parker, K. A. (1998). The Continuity of Peirce's Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.
Peirce, B. (1881). Ideality in the Physical Sciences. Little, Brown.
Peirce, C. S. (1908). A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God. The Hibbert Journal. A Quarterly Review of Religion, Theology and Philosophy, 25, 90-112.
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers, vols. 1-8. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss y A. W. Burks (Eds.). Harvard University Press. Se citan por número de volumen y página, separados por un punto, e indicando seguidamente el año. [CP]
Peirce, C. S. (1966). The Charles S. Peirce Papers. [MS] 32 rollos de microfilms de los manuscritos conservados en la Houghton Library. Harvard University Library, Photographic Service. Para la numeración de los manuscritos se sigue el catalogo de R. Robin (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. University of Massachusetts Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992-98). The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, vols. 1-2. N. Houser y C. Kloesel (Eds.). Indiana University Press. [EP]
Oya, A. (2021). Charles S. Peirce's Natural Foundation for Religious Faith. Teorema, 40(3), 87-99.
Pietarinen, A. & Bellucci, F. (2014). New Light on Peirce's Conceptions of Retroduction, Deduction, and Scientific Reasoning. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(4), 353-373.
Potter, V. (1976). C. S. Peirce's Argument for God's Reality: A Pragmatist 's View. En J. Armenti (Ed.), The Pappin Festschrift: Essays in Honor of Joseph Papin, (pp. 224-244). Villanova University Press.
Raposa, M. (1989). Peirce's Philosophy of Religion. Indiana University Press.
Raposa, M. (2020). Theosemiotic: Religion, Reading, and the Gift of Meaning. Fordham University Press.
Rodrigues, C. T. (2017). The Vagueness of the Muse—The Logic of Peirce's Humble Argument for the Reality of God. Sophia, 56, 163-182.
Rohr, D. (2019). The Humble Argument is Musement on God's Great Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 55(4), 429-453.
Schmidt, J. A. (2018). A Neglected Additament: Peirce on Logic, Cosmology, and the Reality of God. Signs, 9, 1-20.
Snyder, L. J. (2021). El Club de los desayunos filosóficos. Cuatro notables amigos que transformaron la ciencia y cambiaron el mundo. Acantilado.
Ward, R. A. (2018). Peirce and Religion: Knowledge, Transformation, and the Reality of God. Lexington Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright over their work.
