RESEARCH ARTICLE
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024) 9 | 1
Optical design of a tunable microneedle array for
photodynamic therapy of metastatic melanomas
Diptayan Dasguptaa, Sonam Berwalb,
Bharpoor Singhc, Neha Khatrid
Abstract: The need for photodynamic therapy is increasing with
the rise of skin cancer melanoma detection. However, low pen-
etration depth of light in the UV range and higher scattering of
skin tissues cause harsh clinical practices and reduced irradi-
ance for the activation of chemicals such as photosensitizers
to facilitate cell necrosis of malignant tumors. In this paper,
a tunable microlens integrated on a microneedle array is de-
signed for variable focusing to reduce melanomas at multiple
sites with an improved intensity for reactive oxygen species
production. A light distribution of 36% percent of the input in-
tensity is achieved at the targeted distance of 4.35 mm for blue
light. Red light attained a light distribution of 13% of the input
intensity at a targeted distance of 6.5 mm. Designing such a
light, delivery-based in-vivo biomedical device is of extreme im-
portance for photodynamic therapy of skin cancer on and beyond
the epidermal tissue layer.
Keywords: Microneedle array; microlens; skin cancer; target
delivery; optical design.
1. INTRODUCTION
Cancer is a major public health issue on a global scale, as evidenced
by the 10 million deaths caused in 2020 (Sung et al., 2021). Amongst
all the types of cancers found in the human body, skin cancer is one
of the most aggressive and lethal forms of cancer that pose a signif-
icant threat to public health due to its ability to resist chemothera-
py and spread to other parts of the body through metastasis. Based
on its origin and certain medical characteristics, skin cancer can be
classied into three general types which include basal cell carcino-
mas, squamous cell carcinomas, and cutaneous melanomas (Naidoo,
Kruger, & Abrahamse, 2018). Basal cell carcinomas and squamous
cell carcinomas are classied as nonmelanocytic skin cancers, and
they do not typically spread to adjacent healthy tissues (Allen, 2000).
In contrast, cutaneous melanomas are considered to be metastatically
invasive, as they can spread and infect nearby healthy tissues (Egger-
mont et al., 2014). Being known to be highly drug-resistant, cutane-
ous melanomas cause low patient survival and a high rate of relapse.
Cutaneous Melanomas usually result from the malignancy of a single
melanocyte or the malfunctioning of dysplastic nevi, which are cells
responsible for producing the melanin pigment and are located in the
deepest regions of the epidermis and the early regions of the dermis
(Naidoo et al., 2018). As skin cancer progresses, metastatic melanoma
develops when cancerous cells from the epidermis spread and invade
Article history:
Received: 01-07-2023
Revised: 13-10-2023
Accepted: 07-11-2023
a Department of Applied Optics
and Photonics, University of
Calcutta, Kolkata 700106, India.
bCSIR-CentralScientic
Instruments Organisation,
Chandigarh 160030, India.
AcademyofScientic&
Innovative Research (AcSIR),
Ghaziabad 201002, India.
cCSIR-CentralScientic
Instruments Organisation,
Chandigarh 160030, India.
dCSIR-CentralScientic
Instruments Organisation,
Chandigarh 160030, India.
AcademyofScientic&
Innovative Research (AcSIR),
Ghaziabad 201002, India.
Corresponding author:
nehakhatri@csio.res.in
© The Author(s), 2024
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
2 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
distant organs in the body. As of today’s date, more
than 80% of skin cancer deaths are caused due to
metastatic melanomas (Paluncic et al., 2016).
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an immense-
ly crucial method for the treatment of metastatic
melanomas (Naidoo et al., 2018). The procedure
involves a dynamic interaction between photosensi-
tizer (PS), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and light.
PS can be classied into four basic types, which
include porphyrins, phthalocyanines, chlorins and
porphycenes (Abrahamse & Hamblin, 2016). Por-
phyrins are excessively used for PDT applications
as they are known to be very much stable whereas
Phthalocyanines have higher PDT efcacy as they
consist of a diamagnetic metal ion. (Jiang, Shao,
Yang, Wang, & Jia, 2014; Singh et al., 2015). Chlo-
rins have a higher PDT efcacy for basal cell car-
cinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (Calixto,
Bernegossi, De Freitas, Fontana, & Chorilli, 2016).
Porphycenes are isomeric structures of porphyrins
but electronically congured (Ruiz-González et al.,
2013). As depicted in Fig. 1, the PS in action forms
a light-sensitive reaction to the targeted cancer cell
which gets activated by the localization of light at
a suitable wavelength resulting in the formation of
cyto-toxic ROS, including singlet molecular oxy-
gen, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide anions. ROS
induces photo cytotoxicity by subjecting cancer
cells to oxidative stress, leading to the damage of
their cellular biomolecules, such as lipids, proteins,
and nucleic acids, and causing them to become in-
active. This form of treatment is usually less inva-
sive than conventional forms as it targets specic
cancerous tumor regions based on their stage and
causes limited side effects (Naidoo et al., 2018).
Efcient delivery of photosensitizers and ther-
apeutic light is a critical requirement for effective
photodynamic therapy. However, current delivery
methods, such as intravenous injection of photosensi-
tizers or direct illumination of the skin, have limita-
tions. Intravenous injection can cause photosensitiz-
er accumulation in the circulatory system, leading to
harmful effects on healthy tissues (Zhao et al., 2022).
Light delivery inside the skin tissue is also limited
due to its scattering and absorption. Hence most of
the studies for such applications are based on mi-
croneedle array (MNA) (M. Kim et al., 2016). MNAs
are invasive tools that pierce through the stratum cor-
neum to deliver drugs. The functionality of MNAs
can be classied into two applications: Light-deliv-
ery MNAs and Drug Delivery MNAs (Ganeson et
al., 2023; Li, Zhao, Zhang, Ling, & Zhang, 2022).
Despite the advantages of MNA-mediated trans-
dermal delivery of photosensitizers having been
proved, the delivery method of the other PDT key
element, therapeutic light, is yet to be improved.
For example, most of the clinical practices of PDT
use direct application of the light source onto the
skin tissue causing very high scattering and absorp-
tion inside the stratum corneum, hence reducing ef-
fectiveness (Kim & Darafsheh, 2020). Furthermore,
the penetration depth of the UV light spectrum is
on the lower end, such as for blue light, it is 1 mm
and for red light, it is 4 mm (Ash, Dubec, Donne,
& Bashford, 2017). As a result, limitations of the
photosensitizer effectivity for metastatic melano-
mas occur in depths even more than 4 mm into the
skin tissue. The spectral range spanning from 600
to 1200 nm is commonly referred to as the “optical
window of tissue”. However, it should be noted that
light with wavelengths beyond 800 nm is incapable
of producing singlet oxygen due to its insufcient
energy required to initiate a photodynamic reac-
tion, as opposed to shorter wavelengths (Sharman,
Allen, & Van Lier, 1999; Zhu & Finlay, 2008). Se-
lecting an appropriate light source for Photodynam-
ic Therapy (PDT) can be a challenging task since
no single light source is universally optimal for all
indications, even when employing the same photo-
sensitizer (PS). Factors to consider when making
this choice include PS absorption, the tumor loca-
tion, size, accessibility and tissue characteristics of
the affected area, cost, and size of the light source
(Kim & Darafsheh, 2020).
Several techniques to overcome the issue of
light delivery and performance enhancement of
light particles inside tissues have been reported.
In 2016, Kim et al. rst demonstrated the use of an
optical lens-microneedle array (OMNA) to improve
light delivery in human skin tissues at a wavelength
of 498 nm, extending the penetration depth from
1.3 to 2.5 mm (Kim et al., 2016). In 2018, Wu et
al. proposed a low-cost fabrication process for a
painless and thinner structure of OMNA. They suc-
cessfully demonstrated that OMNA could enhance
the light transmission efciency for light therapy
(Wu, Kono, Takama, & Kim, 2019). They also de-
signed a tunable thickness device consisting of a
micropatterned optical sheet with MNA resulting
in light transmission efciency with reduced pain,
and improved skin care in dermatology (Wu, Taka-
ma, & Kim, 2019). This led to the development of
a height xation device for blue light delivery on a
culture dish and an LED system to conduct the cell
RESEARCH ARTICLE Optical design of a tunable microneedle array
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024), 9 | 3
apoptosis using an MNA array (Wu et al., 2022).
Furthermore, Zhao et al. proposed a dual-function
dissolvable MNA for delivering light as well as
drugs with reduced therapeutic irradiance resulting
in limited skin damage (Zhao et al., 2022). Yang et
al. demonstrated a deep tissue light enhancement
and delivery system for in vivo photothermal treat-
ment, using gold nanoshells and a fabricated optical
ber needle array with multimodal bers (Yang et
al., 2017). The transportation of visible and near-in-
frared light to interstitial tissues has also been facil-
itated through the application of optical bers and
ber-optic MNAs [(Guo et al., 2015; Okuno et al.,
2013; Robinson et al., 2010)].
In this work, an optical design of a tunable mi-
crolens array integrated into a MNA array is pro-
posed to address the therapeutic challenges asso-
ciated with metastatic melanomas located in deep
tissues beyond the epidermal layer. The design aims
to have multiple focuses of light onto the skin tissue
for multiple underlying tumors with enhanced light
intensity distribution for blue and red light. It was
developed to ensure compliance with the photother-
mal damage benchmark. Furthermore, an optimiza-
tion method is also strategized for this application.
2. DESIGN METHODOLOGY
AND THEORETICAL FORMULATION
In this section, the design methodology of the de-
vice is described with its theoretical formulation.
Section 2.1 describes the human skin model design
for this application. Section 2.2 shows the design
principles of the microlens array (MLA) and MNA.
The entire design procedure of the microlens array
and microneedle array was performed using Zemax
Opticstudio and Solidworks respectively.
2.1. Skin Model
The human skin is identied as an interfacial barrier
from the environment. Light penetration inside skin
tissue is different for different wavelengths. Blue light
gets extinguished within 1 mm inside the tissue lay-
er whereas it is roughly around 4 mm for red light as
shown in the schematic skin model in Fig. 2. The skin
model has scattering properties which lead to light
dispersion and hence, eventually reduces the energy
density with increasing depth. The scattering model
for photons inside tissues is designed using the Hen-
vey-Greenstein scattering function (Ash et al., 2017):
Figure 1. Steps involved in photodynamic therapy. (a) Light is provided to the system which as a
result activates the photosensitizer. (b) This indicated the production of ROS after the PS is excited.
(c) Singlet oxygen, a type of ROS helps in the tumor cell necrosis procedure. When exposed to an
appropriate wavelength, cancer cells undergo oxidative stress, inducing photo cytotoxicity through
the formation of singlet molecular oxygen. This process damages cellular biomolecules like lipids,
proteins, and nucleic acids, rendering the cancer cells inactive.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
4 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
(1)
where α is the longitudinal scattering function and
g is the anisotropic factor, ranging from −1 ≤ g ≤ 1,
from backscattering through isotropic scattering
to forward scattering. The longitudinal scattering
function is calculated by (Magnain, Elias, & Frige-
rio, 2008):
(2)
The thickness of each skin layer varies accord-
ing to different body layers (Oltulu, Ince, Kokbu-
dak, Findik, & Kilinc, 2018). The thickness of the
skin affects the effectiveness of PDT in different
regions of the body. Hence depending on the loca-
tion, this can affect the diffusion of light and the
absorption of the photosensitizing agent. The light
diffusion ux is calculated using the below equa-
tion (Magnain et al., 2008):
(3)
where μ = cosӨ and ϖ = s/(k+s). The scatterers
embedded in the medium are characterized by their
absorption and scattering coefcients, respectively,
k and s. F, being the collimating ux, follows Fres-
nel and Snells law. P(u,ui) is dened as the phase
function for probability for an incident light with
the direction ui to be scattered in the direction ui
Single and multiple scattering are separated here
and are respectively expressed by the second and
third terms of equation (3).
Figure 2. Thickness model used for skin. Blue light cannot penetrate beyond
1 mm inside the skin whereas red light can penetrate to 4mm inside the tissue.
The optical depth differential () is factorized
on parameters such as wavelength (λ), skin depth (z)
and directions which are dened by angles (Ө, ф)
and its unit vector u. It is calculated by:
(4)
The incident angle is taken as 0°.
Region Epidermis (μm) Dermis (μm) Total Thickness (μm)
Breast 164.3 5888 6052.3
Scalp 112 .4 3132.8 3245.8
Abdomen 163.3 5 4 9 7.7 5661
Back 116 5717.8 5834
Dorsum of hand 244.8 2538.5 2284
Dorsum of foot 206.4 2363.3 2583
Table 1. Depth chart of skin for different body regions
where PDT can be used (Oltulu e t al., 2018).
RESEARCH ARTICLE Optical design of a tunable microneedle array
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024), 9 | 5
The dermis contains various sublayers including
the upper blood net, reticular dermis and subcuta-
neous fat. The average depth chart of shin tissue
for different body regions where this model can
be used is shown in Table 1. The tumor size under-
neath the skin layers is classied according to the
Breslow depth which is a helpful measure of how
far melanoma has invaded the body (Marghoob,
Koenig, Bittencourt, Kopf, & Bart, 2000). The stag-
ing of skin cancer melanomas can be classied into
9 levels starting from a depth of less than 0.76 mm,
which makes the melanoma on site to distant metas-
tasis (Iqbal, Biermann, Ali, Zaini, & Metzger, 2019;
Keung & Gershenwald, 2018; Marghoob et al.,
2000). Metastasis describes the spread of melano-
ma throughout the human skin to other parts of the
body. M0, the earliest stage, denotes no evident dis-
tant metastasis whereas M1 metastasis denotes evi-
dent spread or distant metastasis. It is the last stage
or stage IV of melanoma, which can occur at a depth
of more than 4mm into the tissue. Usually, it means
that the melanoma has proliferated the whole body.
PDT dosimetry also plays a crucial role in
reducing melanoma and inducing cell necrosis
(Naidoo et al., 2018; Swavey & Tran, 2013). This
process is complex, as it involves the dynamic in-
teractions of light, photosensitizer, and oxygen. The
clinical efcacy of PDT is determined by multiple
factors, such as the type of dosimetry employed, the
total dose, light exposure time, delivery method,
and fractionation scheme. Furthermore, the char-
acteristics of the cancer type, melanoma spread,
and skin thickness must also be taken into account
(Kim & Darafsheh, 2020). Skin contains various
chromophores with scattering and absorption coef-
cients that strongly depend on the wavelength of
light. The tissue’s scattering properties result from
inherent chromophore attenuation and the size of
particles within the tissue, which dictate the type
of scattering that takes place. This scattering phe-
nomenon causes light dispersion within the tissue,
leading to a gradual reduction in energy density as
depth increases (Ash et al., 2017).
2.2. Microlens and Microneedle Design
The proposed design consists of an 11x11 array of
multifocal microlens and MNA where each micro-
lens corresponds to an MNA structure. As depicted
in Fig 3a, the variation of focal length is construct-
ed in a vertical direction to focus on the subsequent
layers of the skin tissue. The proposed MNA makes
the light focus on multiple tumors, increasing the
effective ROS formation and the accuracy of tu-
mor reduction & elimination for PDT considering
there is enough photosensitizer and ROS present
in the tissue. The focal length of the MLA makes
the illumination area tunable as shown in Fig. 3b.
Increasing the eld of illumination (FOI) results
in a corresponding increase in the spread of light
throughout the skin tissue. The designed MLA and
MNA structure is useful for melanomas or tumors
which occur at a depth of more than 3 cm, where
blue and red light tend to get extinguished or have
limited performances. The microlens array is de-
signed using the following equation (Khatri, Berw-
al, Manjunath, & Singh, 2023):
(5)
Where r is the lens distance concerning the
optics axis and hL is the lens height at the vertex.
For spherically designed MLA, k=0. The radius of
curvature (R) relates to the focal length using the
following equation:
(6)
Microlens
array
Radius of
Curvature (mm)
Back focal
length (mm)
R1 1.3 2.51
R2 1.5 2.90
R3 1.7 3.29
R4 1.9 3.67
R5 2.0 3.87
R6 2.2 4.25
R7 2.4 4.64
R8 2.6 5.03
R9 2.8 5.41
R10 35.80
R11 3.25 6.28
Table 2. Microlens Array Dimensions.
The variable focal length helps in a better dis-
tribution of light radiation inside the skin tissue.
The target design specication of the MLA is listed
in Table 2. The R1-R11 is the specic row number
for which the tunable focal length is presented. The
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
6 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
proposed MLA and MNA can be produced as a sin-
gle optical element using transparent and durable
materials that do not harm the skin upon applica-
tion. To fulll this criterion, poly-lactic acid (PLA)
is used as a suitable option for the MNA due to its
refractive index of 1.47 and low absorption coef-
cient of 0.014 mm–1 for wavelengths beyond 400 nm.
Fig. 4 and 5 show the structure of the designed de-
vice. The selected light sources are two lasers with
a wavelength of 491 nm and 675 nm with 20 mW
power. To achieve optimal results with PDT, it is
crucial to ensure the light source is suitable for the
target tissue, delivery device, and photosensitizer.
Laser technology is commonly employed for PDT
due to its ability to generate coherent, monochro-
matic light with a narrow bandwidth. The excep-
tional optical power of lasers and their capacity to
produce specic wavelengths make them an excel-
lent choice for matching with particular photosensi-
tizers (Kim & Darafsheh, 2020).
Figure 3. (a) Variation of the tunability is constructed in the vertical direction.
The lenses which appear to be thicker are short focusing whereas the thinner ones are longer
focusingmicrolens.(b)Thefocallengthisalsoafactorforthetotaleldofillumination.
The needle inserts a force of about 2.75-2.8N
which can be calculated by the buckling equation
(He, Chen, & Tang, 2008):
(7)
The maximum or critical force (Pe) is deter-
mined by the modulus of elasticity (E), area mo-
ment of inertia (I), column length (L), and spring
constant (μ).
Figure 4. Close view of the designed microlens
integrated on a microneedle array structure.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Optical design of a tunable microneedle array
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024), 9 | 7
Figure 5. Design parameters of the microneedle array
ortheeldofviewenhancement.
3. COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION
AND SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section, the results obtained from this simu-
lation study have been explained, along with an op-
timization strategy. Section 3.1 depicts the overall
optimization procedure whereas section 3.2 depicts
the results obtained.
3.1. Optimization Strategy
An optimization procedure has been shown to
maximize performance, as illustrated in Fig. 6.
The focusing depth is set primarily as the light
on each layer of skin will depend on it. Modu-
lating factors are then dened to set up the op-
timization pathways. This is solely dependent on
Figure 6.Optimizationalgorithmowcharttomaximizetheperformancevariables.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
8 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
the application and designated wavelength selec-
tion. The wavefront control system is designed to
enable control of illumination using a ray map-
ping technique, depending on tissue constraints,
thereby improving accuracy in the dosimetry of
the photosensitizer. To achieve optimal pene-
tration depth, a positional optimization system
has been employed to design and set design con-
straints. Two sets of wavelengths, as mentioned
earlier, have been considered to enhance penetra-
tion depth under realistic boundary conditions.
Boundary conditions can be added based on the
selection criteria of light dosimetry and spatial
uniformity of the FOI. The larger the FOI, the
more area is covered. Initially, a system with vari-
able illumination space is obtained. Under this
system, the optimization takes place through two
pathways. The microlens with the lowest and the
highest focal length values contribute to the limits
of depth of eld. Next, ray mapping is performed
to point rays at every skin layer, keeping in mind
the absorption rate of the tissue. The positional
optimization system is used after ray mapping in
order to nd the limits of the rays. It usually gets
reduced with the increase in skin depth. However,
the FOI increases, providing a more diffused area
of illumination, resulting in the reduction of light
intensity. After that, the following step requires
the checking of appropriate wavelength and eld
angles. Upon satisfying the parameters, the sys-
tem gives optimized results. Otherwise, initial
parameters are revised and the optimization
method is performed again.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The input laser strikes on the microlens array
produce one beam for each needlepoint in an
11x11 system. The MNA acts as a bridging path-
way device between air and high diffusion & ab-
sorption-enabled skin medium. Insertion of the
MNA is a painless procedure, making the photo-
dynamic process hassle-free with improved per-
formance. Fig. 7 shows the working principle of
the variable focal length system. Fig. 7a denotes
the microlens array schematics used for design
whereas Fig. 7b denotes the variable illumina-
tion scheme after adding the microneedle array.
Simulations were performed on the designed
11x11 array.
Figure 7. (a) schematic of the working principle of a smaller tunable microlens array.
(b) Schematics of the working principle of a smaller proposed design.
The microlens array has a distributed focusing
scheme on the MNA for light penetration at dif-
ferent depths. This results in ROS production at
different skin depths. The targeted depth for blue
light is at 4.35 mm to perform PDT at optimized
results.
The extended depth of eld typically improves
light delivery by increasing the appropriate depth.
At a depth of 4.35 mm, the optical intensity at the
tissue surface is approximately 36% of the input
intensity, and it gradually decreases as the light
penetrates deeper into the skin tissue. Fig. 8a,b
show the detector display at a depth of 2 mm inside
the skin tissue, with lenses at the R1 and R2 posi-
tions illuminating the epidermal layer and beyond.
As the ray path becomes unfocused, the light be-
comes distorted, as shown in Fig. 8c. resulting in
reduced power on the tissue. Fig. 9a depicts tun-
able illumination at a depth of 3.5 mm inside the
skin tissue, and Fig. 9b shows the focused lighting
onto the initial reticular dermal layers. Fig. 10a
demonstrates illumination at the end of the der-
mal layer, where the light is focused by R10 and
R11. In conclusion, this attempt at optical simula-
tion has demonstrated improved light delivery into
skin fold models.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Optical design of a tunable microneedle array
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024), 9 | 9
Figure 9. (a) Detector display of the designed system for blue light at 3.5 mm
inside the skin tissue. (b) focused image of R3 and R4 at the reticular dermis.
Figure 10. (a) Detector display of the designed system
for blue light at 4.2 mm inside the skin tissue. (b) focused
image of R10 and R11 at the end of the dermal layer.
Figure 8. (a) Detector display of the designed system for blue light at 2 mm inside
the skin tissue. (b) focused image of R1 and R2 at the epidermis. (c) Defocused
image of R1 and R2 at 2.5 mm inside the skin tissue due to variable focal length.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
10 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
Red light is capable of penetrating deeper into the
skin compared to other visible wavelengths due to its
low absorption as it propagates through the skin tissue.
Therefore, this property makes it an ideal candidate for
various biomedical applications, including skin thera-
pies and diagnostics. The optical penetration depth of
red light targeted using tunable microlens integrated
MNA array within the skin tissue is 6.5 mm, with an
intensity of 13% of the input source. Fig. 11 depicts
the illumination of red light inside the skin tissue,
demonstrating an enhanced penetration depth. This
improved penetration allows for better visualiza-
tion and targeting of specic structures within the
skin, such as blood vessels and pigmented lesions.
Figure 11. Detector display of the designed system
for red light at 6.5 mm inside the skin tissue.
5. CONCLUSION
Light has a tremendous number of therapeutic val-
ues which are very important for the treatment of
skin cancers. One such example is photodynamic
therapy, where a PS is injected into the body which
gets activated at a certain wavelength after being
absorbed by the tumor. This, as a result, causes
a reduction of the tumor size through ROS pro-
duction and cell necrosis. The scope of this paper
includes:
A tunable microlens integrated MNA has been
developed with a variable focal length to in-
crease the intensity and penetration depth of tar-
get areas. This design enables a target depth of
up to 4.35 mm with 36% of the input intensity
for blue light and up to 6.5 mm with 13% of the
input intensity for red light.
Development of the skin model is done to pro-
vide accurate simulation results of light penetra-
tion and irradiance inside the tissue.
An optimization algorithm is also shown and
applied.
Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of tumor
stages is also provided.
Although the current study focuses on optimiz-
ing the system to achieve variable light distribution
at maximal intensity within a specic depth, the
design parameters of the system can be tailored to
meet specic requirements based on various factors,
such as optical wavelength, tissue type, therapeutic
depth range, and in-vitro applications. The proposed
system can also be integrated with medical devices,
such as endoscopes. For instance, if necessary, the
optical microneedle array can be attached to a ber
optical probe for coupled laser PDT in interstitial
application. By extending the effective therapeutic
depth, this device can be widely utilized to enhance
the efcacy of existing photo-therapies, including
blue light therapy for antimicrobial treatment and
photodynamic therapy for different types of cancer-
ous lesions inside the body. With the help of state-
of-the-art fabrication techniques, the implementa-
tion of such a scheme would give enhanced optical
performance for modern biomedical applications in
light delivery systems.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Optical design of a tunable microneedle array
https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795 Nanofabrication (2024), 9 | 11
Declaration of conicting interests
The authors declare that they have no known com-
peting nancial interests or personal relationships
that could have appeared to inuence the work re-
ported in this paper.
REFERENCES
AbrAhAmse, h., & hAmblin, m. r. 2016. New pho-
tosensitizers for photodynamic therapy”. Bio-
chemical Journal, 473(4), 347-364.
Allen, D. C. (2000). Histopathology reporting:
Springer.
Ash, C., DubeC, m., Donne, K., & bAshforD, T.
2017. “Effect of wavelength and beam width
on penetration in light-tissue interaction using
computational methods”. Lasers in Medical Sci-
ence, 32, 1909-1918.
CAlixTo, G. m. f., berneGossi, J., De freiTAs, l.
m., fonTAnA, C. r., & Chorilli, m. 2016.Nan-
otechnology-based drug delivery systems for
photodynamic therapy of cancer: a review.
Molecules, 21(3), 342.
eGGermonT, A. m., ChiArion-sileni, V., Grob, J. J.,
Dummer, r., WolChoK, J. D., sChmiDT, h.,
riChArDs, J. m. (2014). Ipilimumab versus pla-
cebo after complete resection of stage III mel-
anoma: Initial efcacy and safety results from
the EORTC 18071 phase III trial. In: American
Society of Clinical Oncology.
GAneson, K., AliAs, A. h., muruGAiyAh, V., Amir-
ul, A.-A. A., rAmAKrishnA, s., & ViGnesWAri,
s. 2023. “Microneedles for Efcient and Precise
Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy”. Pharmaceu-
tics, 15(3), 744.
Guo, C., yu, h., fenG, b., GAo, W., yAn, m., ZhAnG,
Z., … liu, s. 2015. “Highly efcient ablation of
metastatic breast cancer using ammonium-tung-
sten-bronze nanocube as a novel 1064 nm-la-
ser-driven photothermal agent. Biomaterials,
52, 407-416.
he, x., Chen, y., & TAnG, l. (2008). Modeling of
exible needle for haptic insertion simulation.
Paper presented at the 2008 IEEE Conference
on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer In-
terfaces and Measurement Systems.
iqbAl, A., biermAnn, D., Ali, h. m., ZAini, J., &
meTZGer, m. 2019. “Investigating the impact of
tool inertia on machinability of a β-titanium al-
loy using tool deection and acoustic emission”.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical En-
gineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manu-
facture, 233(7), 1745-1760.
JiAnG, Z., shAo, J., yAnG, T., WAnG, J., & JiA, l.
2014. “Pharmaceutical development, composi-
tion and quantitative analysis of phthalocyanine
as the photosensitizer for cancer photodynamic
therapy”. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio-
medical Analysis, 87, 98-104.
KeunG, e. Z., & GershenWAlD, J. e. 2018. “The
eighth edition American Joint Committee on
Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: im-
plications for melanoma treatment and care”.
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 18(8),
775-784.
KhATri, n., berWAl, s., mAnJunATh, K., & sinGh,
b. 2023. “Optical design and fabrication of
zinc selenide microlens array with extended
depth of focus for biomedical imaging”. Nano-
fabrication, 8.
Kim, m., An, J., Kim, K. s., Choi, m., humAr, m.,
KWoK, s. J., yun, s. h. 2016. “Optical lens-mi-
croneedle array for percutaneous light delivery.
Biomedical Optics Express, 7(10), 4220-4227.
Kim, m. m., & DArAfsheh, A. 2020. “Light sourc-
es and dosimetry techniques for photodynam-
ic therapy”. Photochemistry and Photobiology,
96(2), 280-294.
li, x., ZhAo, Z., ZhAnG, m., linG, G., & ZhAnG, P.
2022. “Research progress of microneedles in the
treatment of melanoma”. Journal of Controlled
Release, 348, 6 31- 6 47.
mAGnAin, C., eliAs, m., & friGerio, J.-m. 2008.
“Skin color modeling using the radiative transfer
equation solved by the auxiliary function meth-
od: inverse problem”. JOSA A, 25(7), 1737-1743.
mArGhoob, A. A., KoeniG, K., biTTenCourT, f. V.,
KoPf, A. W., & bArT, r. s. 2000. “Breslow
thickness and Clark level in melanoma: support
for including level in pathology reports and in
American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging”.
Cancer, 88(3), 589-595.
nAiDoo, C., KruGer, C. A., & AbrAhAmse, h. 2018.
“Photodynamic therapy for metastatic melano-
ma treatment: A review”. Technology in Cancer
Research & Treatment, 17, 1533033818791795.
oKuno, T., KATo, s., hATAKeyAmA, y., oKAJimA, J.,
mAruyAmA, s., sAKAmoTo, m., KoDAmA, T.
2013. “Photothermal therapy of tumors in lymph
nodes using gold nanorods and near-infrared la-
ser light. Journal of Controlled Release, 172(3),
879-884.
RESEARCH ARTICLE Diptayan Dasgupta et al.
12 | Nanofabrication (2024) 9 https://doi.org/10.37819/nanofab.009.1795
olTulu, P., inCe, b., KoKbuDAK, n., finDiK, s., &
KilinC, f. 2018. “Measurement of epidermis,
dermis, and total skin thicknesses from six dif-
ferent body regions with a new ethical histo-
metric technique”. Turkish Journal of Plastic
Surgery, 26(2), 56.
PAlunCiC, J., KoVACeViC, Z., JAnsson, P. J., KA-
linoWsKi, D., merloT, A. m., huAnG, m. l.-h.,
riChArDson, D. r. 2016. “Roads to melano-
ma: Key pathways and emerging players in mel-
anoma progression and oncogenic signaling”.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular
Cell Research, 1863(4), 770-784.
robinson, J. T., Welsher, K., TAbAKmAn, s. m., sher-
loCK, s. P., WAnG, h., luonG, r., & DAi, h. 2010.
“High performance in vivo near-IR (> 1 μm) im-
aging and photothermal cancer therapy with car-
bon nanotubes”. Nano Research, 3, 779-793.
ruiZ-GonZáleZ, r., ACeDo, P., sánCheZ-GArCíA,
D., nonell, s., CeTe, m., sToCKerT, J. C., &
VillAnueVA, A. 2013. “Efcient induction of
apoptosis in HeLa cells by a novel cationic por-
phycene photosensitizer. European Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry, 63, 401-414.
shArmAn, W. m., Allen, C. m., & VAn lier, J. e.
1999. Photodynamic therapeutics: basic princi-
ples and clinical applications”. Drug Discovery
Today, 4(11), 507-517.
sinGh, s., AGGArWAl, A., bhuPAThirAJu, n. D.
K., AriAnnA, G., TiWAri, K., & DrAin, C. m.
2015. “Glycosylated porphyrins, phthalocya-
nines, and other porphyrinoids for diagnostics
and therapeutics”. Chemical Reviews, 115(18),
10261-10306.
sunG, h., ferlAy, J., sieGel, r. l., lAVersAnne, m.,
soerJomATArAm, i., JemAl, A., & brAy, f. 2021.
“Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN
estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide
for 36 cancers in 185 countries”. CA: a Cancer
Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209-249.
sWAVey, s., & TrAn, m. (2013). Porphyrin and
phthalocyanine photosensitizers as PDT agents:
a new modality for the treatment of melanoma.
In Recent Advances in the biology, therapy and
management of melanoma: IntechOpen.
Wu, x., Kono, J., TAKAmA, n., & Kim, b. (2019).
Development of Optical Microlens-Microneedle
Array for Phototherapy. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of JSPE Semestrial Meeting 2019
JSPE Spring Conference.
Wu, x., PArK, J., ChoW, s. y. A., KAsuyA, m. C.
Z., iKeuChi, y., & Kim, b. 2022. “Localised light
delivery on melanoma cells using optical mi-
croneed les”. Biomedical Optics Express, 13(2),
1045-1060.
Wu, x., TAKAmA, n., & Kim, b. (2019). A biodegrad-
able microneedles-trapezoidal micropatterned
patch in the LED therapy. Paper presented at the
2019 IEEE CPMT Symposium Japan (ICSJ).
yAnG, T. D., PArK, K., Kim, h.-J., im, n.-r., Kim, b.,
Kim, T., … Choi, y. 2017. “In vivo photothermal
treatment with real-time monitoring by optical
ber-needle array. Biomedical Optics Express,
8(7), 3482-3492.
ZhAo, h., WAnG, x., GenG, Z., liAnG, n., li, q., hu,
x., & Wei, Z. 2022. “Dual-function microneedle
array for efcient photodynamic therapy with
transdermal co-delivered light and photosensi-
tizers”. Lab on a Chip, 22(23), 4521-4530.
Zhu, T. C., & finlAy, J. C. 2008. “The role of photo-
dynamic therapy (PDT) physics”. Medical Phys-
ics, 35(7Part1), 3127-3136.
rs
Publisher’s note: Eurasia Academic Publishing Group (EAPG) remains neutral
withregardtojurisdictionalclaimsinpublishedmapsandinstitutionalafliations.
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International (CC BY-ND 4.0) licence, which permits copy and redistribute the material in any me-
dium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as
long as you follow the licence terms. Under the following terms you must give appropriate credit,
provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable
manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorsed you or your use. If you remix,
transform,orbuilduponthematerial,youmaynotdistributethemodiedmaterial.Toviewacopy
of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/.