United States, China and The Dispute For Global Hegemony: a Comparative Analysis
Keywords:
Hegemony, United States, China, International Order, Trade War, Tech War, Comparative AnalysisAbstract
The trade and technological war initiated in 2018 between China and the United States has increased interest in the possible hegemonic succession. In this paper, starting from the concept of interstate hegemony, a comparative analysis of the material capabilities of each power in five areas: productive, technological, commercial, monetary-financial and military. This analysis makes it possible to quantify whether China can surpass the United States. As a result, it is concluded that China is far from surpassing the United States in the military and monetary-financial areas, but it can compete in the productive, commercial, and certain critical technological sectors.
References
Anderson, P. (2017). La palabra H. Peripecias de la hegemonía. Akal.
Aglietta, M. & Coudert, V. (2015). El dólar. Pasado, presente y futuro del sistema monetario. Capital Intelectual.
Agnew, John A. (2005). Geopolítica: una re-visión de la política mundial. Trama Editorial.
Arrighi, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Time. Verso.
Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith en Pekín. Orígenes y Fundamentos del Siglo XXI. Akal.
Arrighi, G. & Silver, B. J. (1999). Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. University of Minnesota Press.
Barredo-Zuriarrain, J. & Molero-Simarro, R. (2018). ¿Está China frente al dilema de Triffin?, XVI Jornadas de Economía Crítica, España: Universidad de León.
Brenner, R. (2020). Escalating Plunder, New Left Review, (123), 5-22.
Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position, International Security, 40(3), 7-53.
Cooley, A. & D. H. Nexon. (2020). Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford University Press.
Castro, D., McLaughlin, M. & Chivot, M. (2019). Who Is Winning the AI Race: China, the EU or the United States?, Center for data innovation. http://www2.datainnovation.org/2019-china-eu-us-ai.pdf
Costigan T., Cottle D. & Keys A. (2017). The US dollar as the global reserve currency: implications for US hegemony, World Review of Political Economy 8(1): 104-122.
Davies, S. & Kent, C. (2020). US dollar funding: an international perspective, CGFS Papers, (65), Bank for International Settlements.
Dunford, M. & Liu, W. (2017). A Century of Uneven and Combined Development: The Erosion of United States Hegemony and The Rise of China, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 5, 7-32. Doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-4-56-7-32.
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R. & Timmer, M. P. (2020). The Next Generation of the Penn World Table, American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/
Feng, E., Cheng, A. & Wilburn, T. (2019). ‘China’s tech giant Huawei spans much of the globe despite U.S. efforts to ban it, NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/10/24/759902041/chinas-tech-giant-huawei- spansmuch-of-the-globe-despite-u-s-efforts-to-ban-it.
Fields, D. & Vernengo, M. (2011). Hegemonic currencies during the crisis, The Levy Economics Institute and Economics for Democratic and Open Societies, Working Paper, (666).
Fusaro, L. (2019). Crises and Hegemonic TransitionsFrom Gramsci’s Quaderni to the Contemporary World Economy. Brill.
Garcia herrero, A. & Gary, N.G. (2021). The symphony of technology: Bifurcation is not yet possible in the semiconductor industry, Asia Sectoral Research, Natixis Research. https://www.research.natixis.com/Site/en/publication/cx2ZmzkPFxJxqLHzWH4_ag%3D%3D
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press.
Global Innovation Index (2020). The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? https://cutt.ly/tfOHv2P.
Global Fire Power (2020). Military Strength Ranking 2020. https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
Gourinchas, P., Rey, H., & Sauzet, M. (2019). The international monetary and financial system, Annual Review of Economics, 11(1), 859-893. doi:10.1146/annurev- economics-080217-053518.
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Herrera, D. (2017a). Hegemonía y Relaciones Internacionales/I. Un estado del arte, Revista de Relaciones Internacionales de la UNAM, 127 http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rri/article/view/61145
Herrera, D. (2017b). Hegemonía y Relaciones Internacionales/II. Aproximaciones teóricas críticas en el estudio de la hegemonía mundial, Revista de Relaciones Internacionales de la UNAM, 128 http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rri/article/view/62242
Ikenberry, J., G., & Nexon, D., H. (2019). Hegemony Studies 3.0: The Dynamics of Hegemonic Orders, Security Studies, 28(3), 395-421, DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2019.1604981.
Kai, J. (2017). Rising China in a Changing World. Power Transitions and Global Lidership. Palgrave Macmillan.
Keohane, R. O. (2002). Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. Routledge.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Political Science Quarterly. 93 (1), 132-134.
Kim, M., Lee, H., & Kwak, J. (2020). The changing patterns of China’s international standardization in ICT under techno-nationalism: A reflection through 5G standardization”, International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102145. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102145
Kindleberger, C. P. (1996). World economic primacy: 1500 to 1990, Oxford. Oxford University Press
Klein, M. & Pettis, M. (2020). Trade Wars Are Class Wars, Yale University Press.
Kwon, E. (2015). China’s Monetary Power: Internationalization of the Renminbi, Pacific Focus, 30(1), 78-102. doi https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12038
Lai, H. (2020). The Rationale and Effects of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Re-ducing. Vulnerabilities in Domestic Political Economy, Journal of Contemporary China, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2020.1790896
Lewis, J. A. (2018). Technological Competition and China. Centro de Estudios Estratégicos e Internacionales.
Li, M. (2017). Profit, Accumulation, and Crisis: Long-Term Movement of the Profit Rate in China, Japan, and the United States, The Chinese Economy, 50(6), 381-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2017.1379935
Mathews, J. A., & Selden, M. (2018). China: the emergence of the petroyuan and the challenge to US Dollar hegemony, The Asia-Pacific journal, 16(22), 1-12.
Molero-Simarro, R. (2014). La distribución primaria como factor determinante de la relación entre crecimiento económico y desigualdad de la renta: el caso de la China de la reforma (1978-2007). [Doctoral Thesis]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/25595/
Norrlöf, C. (2014). Dollar hegemony: A power analysis, Review of International Political Economy, 21(5), 1042-1070, DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2014.895773
Norrlöf, C. (2017). Hegemony, hierarchy, and unipolarity: Theoretical and empirical foundations of hegemonic order studies. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics, Oxford University Press
Norrlöf, C. (2020). Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony, International Affairs, 96(5), 1281–1303.
Nye, J. S. (2020). Power and Interdependence with China, The Washington Quarterly, 43(1), 7–21. doi:10.1080/0163660x.2020.1734303
Orduna, L. (2007). “Las ideas de Keynes para el orden económico mundial, Revista de Economía Mundial, nº 106, pp. 195-223.
Parmar, I. (2018). “The US-led liberal order: imperialism by another name?”, International Affairs, 94(1), pp. 151-172
Rajah, R., & Leng, A. (2018). The US-China Trade War. Who dominates global trade?, Global Economic Futures project at the Lowy Institute Lowy. https://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/charts/china-us-trade-dominance/us-china- competition/
Rapkin, D. & Braaten, D. (2009). Conceptualizing hegemonic legitimacy”, Review of International Studies, 35(1), 113–149.
Sanahuja, J.A. (2020). Hegemonía, crisis de globalización y Relaciones Internacionales. Concepciones clásicas y teorización crítica. En El sistema internacional del siglo XXI. Dinámicas, actores y relaciones internacionales. Tirant lo Blanch (pp. 19-51).
Saull, R. (2012). Rethinking Hegemony: Uneven Development, Historical Blocs, and the World Economic Crisis, International Studies Quarterly, 56(2), 323-338
Schenoni, L. L. (2019). Hegemony, VVAA, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press / International Studies Association (ISA).
Song, Y., Chunjiao, Y., Hao, L. & Chen, Xi (2021). Path for China’s high-tech industry to participate in the reconstruction of global value chains, Technology in Society, 65, 101486
Steinberg, F. (2010). China, EE. UU. y el futuro de Bretton Woods II, Revista de Economía Mundial, (25), 109-129.
Strange, S. (1988). States and Markets. Pinter.
Taskinsoy, J. (2020). Diminishing Dollar Hegemony: What Wars and Sanctions Failed to Accomplish, COVID-19 Has, SSRN Electronic Journal. Doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3613367
Wagner, H. (2019). On the (Non-) sustainability of China’s Development Strategies, The Chinese Economy, 52(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2019.1580822
Wallerstein, I. (1984). The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilization. Cambridge University Press.
Winecoff, K.W. (2020). The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony, Revisited: Structural Power as a Complex Network Phenomenon, European Journal of International Relations, 26(S1):209–252.
Worth, O. (2020). The concept (s) of hegemony in IPE The Routledge Handbook to Global Political Economy: Conversations and Inquiries. Routledge.
Xuetong, Y, (2020). Bipolar Rivalry in the Early Digital Age, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 13 (3), 313–341, https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaa007
Zhu, M., Zhang, L. & Peng, D. (2019). China’s Productivity Convergence and Growth Potential—A Stocktaking and Sectoral Approachs, Working Paper No. 19/263, FMI. https://n9.cl/3e0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright over their work.
