Capacity of ICT’s to virtualize field work: Theory and practice from geography
Keywords:
Field work, Geotechnology, Virtualization, Field trip, Innovation, Inclusion, GeographyAbstract
Geographical didactics in higher education incorporates field work as a first order instrument. Field trips constitute the basis of geographical research since they provide knowledge about the configurative elements and processes of the geographical space. Geotechnologies can virtually recreate scenarios analogous to traditional field trips. The qualifications of two groups of students were compared without finding significant differences between those who made virtual and traditional field trips. The virtualization of field trips is a useful and inclusive element beyond the pandemic context.
References
Aguilera, D. (2018). Field trip as a didactic resource to teach sciences. A systematic review. Revista Eureka, 15(3), 3103. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3103
Asún, R., Palma, I., Aceituno, R., & Duarte, F. (2021). El impacto emocional de la pandemia en los jóvenes: Sociabilidad, conflictos, y política. Revista de Sociología, 36(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-529x.2021.64423
Barberá, E., & Badia, A. (2004). Educar con aulas virtuales: Vol. CXLVII Apr. Antonio Machado Libros S.A.
Brown, A., & Green, T. (2016). Virtual Reality: Low-Cost Tools and Resources for the Classroom. TechTrends, 60(5), 517–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0102-z
Bryson, J. R., & Andres, L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478, 44(4), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478
Chiarella, D., & Vurro, G. (2020). Fieldwork and disability: An overview for an inclusive experience. Geological Magazine, 157(11), 1933–1938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000928
Cliffe, A. D. (2017). A review of the benefits and drawbacks to virtual field guides in today’s Geoscience higher education environment. In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 14, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0066-x
Díez-Gutiérrez, E.-J. (2021). Gobernanza híbrida digital y Capitalismo EdTech: la crisis del COVID-19 como amenaza. Foro de Educación, 19(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.860
Dykes, J., Moore, K., & Wood, J. (1999). Virtual environments for student fieldwork using networked components. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(4), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588199241274
Firomumwe, T. (2021). Exploring the opportunities of virtual fieldwork in teaching geography during covid-19 pandemic. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 45(45), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.973983
Fletcher, S., France, D., Moore, K., & Robinson, G. (2007). Practitioner perspectives on the use of technology in fieldwork teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063719
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Fuller, I. C. (2012). Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area, 44(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00990.x
Gómez Trigueros, I. M., & Moreno Vera, J. R. (2018). Nuevas didácticas geográficas: el modelo TPACK, los MOOCs y Google EarthTM en el aula. EDMETIC, 7(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v7i2.9547
Google Arts & Culture. (2021). The Hidden Worlds of the National Parks. Google. https://artsandculture.withgoogle.com/en-us/national-parks-service/parks
Hall, T., Healey, M., & Harrison, M. (2004). Fieldwork and disabled students: Discourses of exclusion and inclusion. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826042000242495
Jacobson, A. R., Militello, R., & Baveye, P. C. (2009). Development of computer-assisted virtual field trips to support multidisciplinary learning. Computers and Education, 52(3), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.007
Janicki, T., & Liegle, J. O. (2001). Development and evaluation of a framework for creating web-based learning modules: A pedagogical and systems perspective. In Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network (Vol. 5, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i1.1887
Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. In Journal of Geography in Higher Education (Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 313–332). https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269708725439
Kingston, D. G., Eastwood, W. J., Jones, P. I., Johnson, R., Marshall, S., & Hannah, D. M. (2012). Experiences of using mobile technologies and virtual field tours in Physical Geography: Implications for hydrology education. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(5), 1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1281-2012
Krakowka, A. R. (2012). Field Trips as Valuable Learning Experiences in Geography Courses. Journal of Geography, 111(6), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2012.707674
Makransky, G., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Benefits of Taking a Virtual Field Trip in Immersive Virtual Reality: Evidence for the Immersion Principle in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09675-4
Mercer, T. G., Kythreotis, A. P., Harwood, J., Robinson, Z. P., George, S. M., Sands, D., Brown, J. M., & Sims, T. (2022). The benefits of virtual fieldtrips for future-proofing geography teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2041569
Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Minh, V. T., Katushin, N., Moezzi, R., Dhoska, K., & Pumwa, J. (2021). Smart Glove for Augmented and Virtual Reality. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, 4(2), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.15157/IJITIS.2021.4.2.663-671
Minocha, S., Tilling, S., & Tudor, A.-D. (2018). Role of Virtual Reality in Geography and Science Fieldwork Education. In Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series, Learning from New Technology, 25 Apr 2018, Belfast. http://oro.open.ac.uk/55876/
Monteiro, D., Liang, H. N., Wang, X., Xu, W., & Tu, H. (2021). Design and Development of a Low-cost Device for Weight and Center of Gravity Simulation in Virtual Reality. ICMI 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479907
Moreira, M. A. (2008). Una breve historia de las políticas de incorporación de las tecnologías digitales al sistema escolar en España. Quaderns Digitals: Revista de Nuevas Tecnologías y Sociedad, 51(ISSN 1575-9393), 1–12. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2566567
Moya-Palomares, M. E., Centeno, J. de D., & Acaso, E. (2005). Itinerario virtual por el Macizo de Peñalara, un método complenentario a las salidas de campo. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias de La Tierra, 13(3), 329–333. https://raco.cat/index.php/ECT/article/view/89066
Palomero, J. E. (2003). Breve historia de la formación psicopedagógica del profesorado universitario en España. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 17(47), 21–41. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=818892
Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340701678032
Poussu-Olli, H. S. (1999). To be a Disabled University Student in Finland. Disability and Society, 14(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926406
Roelofsen, M., & Carter-White, | Richard. (2022). Virtual reality as a spatial prompt in geography learning and teaching. Geographical Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12551
Royal Geographical Society. (n.d.). Royal Geographical Society - Geography resources for teachers. Retrieved July 11, 2022, from https://www.rgs.org/research/higher-education-resources/virtual-field/
Schaaf, R., Skellern, A., Haslett, S. K., & Norcliffe, D. (2012). Google Earth and sustainable development education: examples from human and physical geography. Planet, 26(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2012.00260008
Stokes, A., Feig, A. D., Atchison, C. L., & Gilley, B. (2019). Making geoscience fieldwork inclusive and accessible for students with disabilities. Geosphere, 15(6), 1809–1825. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02006.1
Thorndycraft, V. R., Thompson, D., & Tomlinson, E. (2009). Google Earth, virtual fieldwork and quantitative methods in Physical Geography. Planet, 22(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2009.00220048
Walker, S. E. (2003). Active Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking. Journal of Athletic Training, 38(3), 263–267. /pmc/articles/PMC233182/
Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., Li, C., Li, W., Huang, H., Akdere, M., Mousas, C., & Yu, L.-F. (2021). A Review on Virtual Reality Skill Training Applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 0, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRVIR.2021.645153
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright over their work.
