Manage the talent of university actors through leadership and interest

Researchers and management positions

Authors

  • Rosa Eva López-Hernández Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
  • Estrella Vázquez-Reyes Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco

Keywords:

Human talent, Leadership, Interest, Management, Higher education, Research, Succession planning

Abstract

Talent management in higher education is key to quality education. This study aimed to understand and describe the categories that support the potentialization of the talent of researchers and to know the motivating interests of leadership development. It was conducted under the qualitative approach. We found that talent management is hindered by inefficient practices in recruitment, personnel selection, as well as the weighting of monetary incentives in researchers for their performance. It is recommended to address succession-planning studies in educational organizations to ensure the reserves of key talent.

References

Araya-Castillo, L., & Pedreros-Gajardo, M. (2013). Análisis de las teorías de motivación de contenido: una aplicación al mercado laboral de chile del año 2009. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Cr), IV(142),45-61. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15333870004

Arechavala, R., & Sánchez, C. F. (2017). Las universidades públicas mexicanas: los retos de las transformaciones institucionales hacia la investigación y la transferencia de conocimiento. Revista de la Educación Superior 46(184), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.09.001

Bellou, V., Chaniotakis, I., Kehagias, I., & Rigopoulou, I. (2015). Employer brand of choice: an employee perspective, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(6), 1201-1215, https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.848227

Bhanupriya, K. (2015). Linkage between talent management practices & business performance in it sector of India. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review. 3(5),116-118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349339283

Collings, D., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001

Cuevas, M., Fernández, M., Díaz, F., Gijón, J., Lizarte, E., Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., El., M., Ávalos, I., & Rodríguez, R. (2019). Liderazgo y calidad en la Educación Superior. EDMETIC, Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 8(2), 52-72.https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v8i2.12120

Dakduk, S. y Torres, C. (2013). Los Nuevos significados del Trabajo. Debates IESA, 18(2), 25-28. http://virtual.iesa.edu.ve/servicios/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dakduk-torres-significados.pdf

Foucault, M. (1988) Sujeto y poder. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 50,(3), 3-20. https://perio.unlp.edu.ar/catedras/cdac/wp-content/uploads/sites/96/2020/03/T-FOUCAULT-El-sujeto-y-el-poder.pdf

Gil, M., & Contreras, L. E. (2017). El Sistema Nacional de Investigadores: ¿espejo y modelo? Revista de la Educación Superior, 46 (184) 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.12.004

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00120-0

Ibarra, E., & Vries, W. (2004). La gestión de la universidad. Interrogantes y problemas en busca de respuestas. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 9(22), 575-584. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14002202

Jackson, C. K., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2014). Teacher Effects and Teacher-Related Policies. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 801–825. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040845

Jara, A., Asmat, N., Alberca, N., & Medina, J. (2018) Gestión del talento humano como factor de mejoramiento de la gestión pública y desempeño laboral. Revista venezolana de gerencia. 23(83), 740-760. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/290/29058775014/29058775014.pdf

Joyce, W., & Slocum, J. (2012)Top management talent, strategic capabilities, and firm performance. Organizational Dynamics, 41(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.03.001

Londhe, B. (2016). A study of talent management strategies of educational institutes in Marashtra. International research journal of engineering and technology (IRJET), 3(5), 1345-1353. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i5/IRJET-V3I5276.pdf

López-Hernández, R. E., Aquino, S. P., & Aguilar, N. (En prensa). Plan de sucesión para el relevo de profesores investigadores en universidades públicas mexicanas. Centro Universitario de Ciencias Económico Administrativas (CUCEA).

Morin, E. (2003) Sens du travail, santé mentale et engagement organisationne. Études et recherches. http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/r-543.pdf

Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK, Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010

Muñoz, H. (2011) La universidad mexicana en el escenario global. Perfiles educativos, 33 (número especial), 21-33.http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/peredu/v33nspe/v33nspea3.pdf

Olaskoaga-Larrauri, J., Rodríguez-Armenta, C. E., & Marúm-Espinosa, E. (2020). The direction of reforms and job satisfaction among teaching staff in higher education in Mexico, Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1819225

Perdomo-Ortiz, J., Valencia, C., Durán, W. F., & Heredia, O. (2020). Effect of High-Performance Work Practices on Academic Research Productivity. Latin American Business Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2020.1837632

Programa de las naciones unidas para el desarrollo [PNUD]. 2022. Los ODS en acción. PNUD. https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals.

Rhodes, C., & Brundrett, M. (2012) Retaining leadership talent in schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 40(1), 19-34. https://cceam.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ISEA_2012_40_1.pdf#page=25

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Tyagi, S., Singh, G., & Aggarwal, T. (2017). Talent management in education sector. International Journal & Informatics (IJCI) 6(1/2), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijci.2017.6206

Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly 10(2), 285–305. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984399000132

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16