Social medias and the spread of hoaxes: perception of secondary students
Keywords:
Educommunication, Media literacy, Critical citizenship, Students, Exploratory analysisAbstract
Connectivity has changed our way of receiving information, transforming consumers into receivers and transmitters at the same time. This new model facilitates access to data that was previously restricted to only a few groups and also contributes to giving voice to minority and underrepresented social groups. Despite the positive aspects, disinformation has been gaining space and expanding spaces for manipulation among citizens. In this way, literacy is necessary for the development of critical thinking that allows us to face this situation. This study aims to shed light on the situation of education in a context of health crisis in schools in the community of Madrid.
References
Aguaded, I., Caldeiro-Pedreira, M. C., & Garcia-Ruiz, R. (2015). Alfabetización y responsabilidad social como base para el empoderamiento de los prosumidores en el entorno digital. Media&Jornalismo, 43-62.
Alberola, M. (9 de abril de 2018). La corrupción erosiona la confianza de los ciudadanos en las instituciones. El País, pág. https://elpais.com/politica/2018/04/09/actualidad/1523275253_036368.html.
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (31 de mayo de 2018). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2018. PEW RESEARCH CENTER, págs. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.
Arent, H. (2003). Responsabilidade e julgamento - Escritos morais e éticos. Caminho das Letras.
Bartlett, J. (2018). The People Vs Tech: How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). Ebury Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317.
Blanco, P. R. (22 de marzo de 2020). ¿A quién beneficia la avalancha de bulos sobre el coronavirus? El País, pág. https://elpais.com/elpais/2020/03/21/hechos/1584803141_948265.html.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. Profesional de la Información, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23.
Castells, M. (2 de fevereiro de 2014). El impacto de internet en la sociedad: una perspectiva global. Madrid: Open Mind BBVA. Obtenido de Open Mind BBVA: https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/articulos/el-impacto-de-internet-en-la-sociedad-una-perspectiva-global/
Costa-Sánchez, C., & López-García, X. (2020). Comunicación y crisis del coronavirus en España. Primeras lecciones. Profesional de la información, e290304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.04.
Dahl, R. (2001). Sobre a Democracia. Brasília: Editora UnB.
Dahl, R. (2006). On Political Equality. Yale University Press.
Dahlgren, J. P., García, M. B., & Ehrlén, J. (2011). Nonlinear relationships between vital rates and state variables in demographic models. Ecological Society of America, 1181-1187.
García-Galera, M.-C., & Valdivia, A. (2014). Prosumidores mediáticos. Cultura participativa de las audiencias y responsabilidad de los medios. Revista Comunicar, 10-13.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis Theory and Method. Routledge.
Ghenai, A., & Mejova, Y. (2018). Fake Cures: User-centric Modeling of Health Misinformation in Social Media. ACM Digital Library, 1-20. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274327.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 411-426.
Hernández, C. B., & Novara, A. J. (2012). La red: ¿nueva herramienta o nuevo escenario para la participación política? Consideraciones a partir del análisis de las prácticas políticas online de las generaciones más jóvenes. Congreso Internacional “América Latina: La autonimía de una región”, 514-527. Madrid: Trama editorial.
Hernández-Merayo, E., Robles-Vílchez, M.-C., & Martínez-Rodríguez, J.-B. (2013). Jóvenes interactivos y culturas cívicas: sentido educativo, mediático y político del 15M. Revista Comunicar, 59-67.
Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatización: La lógica mediática de las dinámicas cambiantes de la interacción social. La trama de la comunicación, 235-252.
Kahne, J., Lee, N.-J., & Feezell, J. T. (2013). The Civic and Political Significance of Online Partipatory Cultures and Youth Transitioning to Adulthood. Journal of Information Technology & Politics , 1-20.
Kleis-Nielsen, R., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., & Howard, P. N. (2020). Navigating the ‘infodemic’: how people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism - University of Oxford.
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The Elements of Journalism, Revised and Updated 3rd Edition: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Crown.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology (3rd ed). Sage Publications.
Lapuente, V., Fernández-Albertos, J., Ahumada, M., Alonso, A. G., Llobet, G., Parrado, S., . . . Gortázar, L. (2018). La calidad de las instituciones en España. Círculo de Empresarios.
Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2012). Social Media and Democracy: Innovations in Participatory Politics. Routledge.
Miguel-Vara, A. (2020). Se debilita la confianza en los medios, resisten las marcas periodísticas y emerge el periodismo local. Digital News Report es 2020.
Mota, B. S., Bittencourt, M., & Viana, P. M. (2015). A influência de Youtubers no processo de decisão dos espectadores: uma análise no segmento de beleza, games e ideologia. Revista E-Compós, 1-25.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Londres: Reuters Institute y University of Oxford.
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies, 17-37. Obtenido de http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin Books Limited.
Pérez-Dasilva, J.-Á., Meso-Ayerdi, K., & Mendiguren-Galdospín, T. (2020). Fake news y coronavirus: detección de los principales actores y tendencias a través del análisis de las conversaciones en Twitter. El profesional de la información, e290308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08.
Pérez-Rodríguez, M. A. (2007). Declaración de UNESCO en Grunwald (Alemania). Comunicar, 122-125.
Rubio-Gil, Á. (2012). Telos: Cuadernos de comunicación e innovación. Participación política de la juventud, redes sociales y democracia digital, 106-115.
Sharevski, F., Jachim, P., & Florek, K. (2020). To Tweet or Not to Tweet: Covertly Manipulating a Twitter Debate on Vaccines Using Malware-Induced Misperceptions. In Conference, 1-10. https://doi.org/doi.
Van-Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Vreese, C. d., Matthes, J., . . . Sheafer, T. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 3-27.
Viché, M. (2018). La paxis de la ciberanimación. Quaderns d’animació i educació social.
Word Heath Organization. (2 de Marzo de 2022). Word Heath Organization. Obtenido de Novel Coronavirus(2019-nCoV) Situation Report - 13: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330778/nCoVsitrep02Feb2020-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Zúñiga, H. G., Weeks, B., & Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication: Social Media Use Implications for News Seeking and Learning About Politics. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 105-123.
Zúñiga, H.-G. d., Huber, B., & Strauß, N. (2018). Social media and democracy. Profesional de la información, 1699-2407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.01.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles are published under an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright over their work.
